Thursday, April 7, 2011

Searching for Value on the High Seas

Don't let it get away!

Keep track of the stocks that matter to you.

Help yourself with the Fool's FREE and easy new watchlist service today.

These aren't good times to be an ocean shipper.

The Baltic Dry Index, which measures the rates charged by bulk transporters such as DryShips (Nasdaq: DRYS) and Diana Shipping (NYSE: DSX), has fallen from a peak above 4,000 in May to 1,043 today. It has declined by nearly 60% just in the past three months, and it's taken the share prices of many fleet operators down with it.

The following companies have fallen between 12% and 40% in the past year and are likely to report some pretty ugly numbers in the coming quarters. But if you look past the near future, you may find some considerable long-term value in owning a carefully selected ocean carrier. Most now trade for significantly less than the price of their ships, and many can be had for less than the cash flow they generated over the past three years, which was a depressed environment to begin with. And things just may be on the cusp of turning around.

A new beginning?

Company Name

Market Cap

Price/3-Year Average OCF

Price/Book

Debt/Equity

52-Week % Performance

DryShips $1.5 billion 3.67 0.52 97% (12%)
Diana Shipping $945 million 4.80 0.85 30% (12%)
Navios Maritime (NYSE: NM) $492 million 4.32 0.48 219% (22%)
Genco Shipping (NYSE: GNK) $403 million 1.64 0.37 163% (40%)
Excel Maritime (NYSE: EXM) $378 million 1.93 0.23 70% (19%)
Eagles Bulk Shipping (Nasdaq: EGLE) $256 million 2.46 0.39 174% (18%)
Paragon Shipping (NYSE: PRGN) $161 million 2.09 0.33 72% (30%)

Data from Yahoo! Finance, Morningstar, and author's calculations. As of 1/30/11.

Even as commodities have continued their strong performance, dry bulk shipping has suffered from a confluence of woes. For starters, the worldwide cargo shipping fleet is estimated to grow by 18% this year, and that forecast has sparked fears of oversupply. It also hasn't helped that Australia, a major exporter of iron and coal, has seen its exports hampered by excessive flooding. Analysts have estimated that these floods may eventually cause more than 30 percentage points of decline in the Baltic Dry.

With any luck, these matters will be temporary, and they will shortly blow over. Some observers are expecting a new record in goods shipped this year, and so long as the demand for commodities continues to soar, shippers should work through this eventually.

Granted, there are considerable risks. Investors looking to navigate through these waters should know that high levels of debt are all too common in this industry. Small changes in value therefore have a disproportionate equity effect. It's also difficult in such an environment to keep up with debt payments during prolonged periods of slowdown.

The industry has also become heavily dependent on China. The Chinese consume more than 50% of the world's iron ore and import more than one 150 million tons of coal each year to satisfy their domestic demand. A slowdown in China could very quickly bring with it a drop in shipping demand.

But despite the potential headwinds, one has to get excited about these historically cheap valuations. Many of these businesses trade at only a fraction of their five-year average price-to-book values. Investors believing in the strength of commodities may find that with a little bit of due diligence, an investment in the shipping industry may turn into a profitable adventure.

For related Foolish content:

Keep up with the latest Foolish coverage of shipping stocks, or any other stocks you'd like to follow. Just add the stocks you're interested in to My Watchlist.


Powered By iWebRSS.com

finance economics precious metals investing in gold investing in silver

ECB hikes rates, says move not planned as first of many (Reuters)

FRANKFURT (Reuters) ? The European Central Bank raised interest rates for the first time since the 2008 financial crisis on Thursday but signaled it was not necessarily the start of a series of similar steps.

ECB President Jean-Claude Trichet used phrasing at a news conference traditionally seen as associated with further swift hikes. But he stressed that the bank had not taken Thursday's decision as the first in a series of moves.

That comment surprised financial markets which were betting on two further rises in rates before the end of this year.

It may reflect the bank's concern that jacking up borrowing costs too fast would harm the euro zone economies struggling with high debt.

Trichet also said that the ECB had encouraged Portugal to request an international bailout -- a day after its Prime Minister Jose Socrates relented and asked for aid.

"The stance of monetary policy remains accommodative and thereby continues to lend considerable support to economic activity and job creation," Trichet said, reading out the bank's post-decision statement at a news conference.

"We will continue to monitor very closely all developments with respect to upside risks to price stability."

The phrase "monitoring closely" was once seen as a sign the ECB was two months off raising rates while "very closely" meant it was on the cards for the next month. But the term and use of "very" has lost its significance in recent years.

When pressed on the outlook for interest rates, Trichet said: "We did not decide today that it was the first in a series of interest rate increases."

The euro fell further after those comments, while shorter-dated euro zone debt pared recent losses.

FLAGGED

The increase in the ECB's benchmark refinancing rate marks a gentle exit from the central bank's policy response to the global financial crisis. It had held the refi rate at a record low 1.0 percent since May 2009.

ECB policymakers had flagged the decision heavily in advance and all but four of 80 economists polled by Reuters last week expected a 25 basis point rise.

"This makes the ECB the first major developed economy central bank to hike rates and the decision will cement its reputation as a single-minded inflation fighter," said ABN Amro economist Nick Kounis.

"The hike is unwelcome for peripheral countries, but arguably the core member states were in need of this move already some time ago. In that sense, the timing of the increase is a balancing act, which is part and parcel of the one-size-fits-all monetary policy," he added.

The ECB also raised its deposit rate by 25 basis points to 0.50 percent, and increased its marginal lending rate by the same amount to 2.0 percent.

The rate decision came less than 24 hours after Portugal announced it was seeking European Union support, a decision long expected by financial markets.

For months, the central bank has been privately pushing Lisbon to accept assistance, and the fact it has finally happened may free the ECB to take a firmer line on the budding inflationary risk.

The ECB is concerned that firm oil prices -- near 2-1/2 year highs -- could boost inflation expectations, and financial markets are pricing in two further quarter-point rises in interest rates this year to follow Thursday's move.

But the Frankfurt-based bank must be careful not to hurt euro zone economies struggling to generate growth after implementing eye-watering public sector cuts to regain the faith of market creditors.

(Additional reporting by Sakari Suoninen; Editing by Hugh Lawson)


Powered By iWebRSS.com

investing in gold investing in silver bullion investing stocks markets

Berkshire Hathaway's Dave Sokol resigns

Dave Sokol, who ran several of Berkshire's businesses, including Mid-American Energy, resigned from Berkshire on Monday. In a statement announcing the departure late Wednesday, Mr Buffett revealed that Mr Sokol purchased shares in chemicals maker Lubrizol shortly before he recommended to Mr Buffett that Berkshire invest in the company. In the middle of March, Berkshire announced the $9bn (�5.6bn) takeover of Lubrizol.


Powered By iWebRSS.com

money finance economics precious metals investing in gold

Wednesday, April 6, 2011

Navigating Today's Topsy-Turvy Media World

It's all about the content. That's the buzzword in the media world these days -- content. As worlds collide, just about everyone that produces information and entertainment makes up the media -- new media, old media, liar media, print, online, smartphone, tablet, anachronistic televsision media, streaming media, you name it. Increasingly, every possible media entity competes against one another or is getting ready to, despite a partnership here or a contract there. And almost everybody claims that they have "premium content."

Consider companies on opposite ends of the spectrum. In it's latest annual report, Demand Media (DMD), often erroneously called a "content farm," notes that it offers "subscriptions to premium content... on [its] owned and operated websites." Satellite radio provider Sirius/XM (SIRI) practically brands its entire business on the notion of "premium content."

But exactly what is "premium content" and does the use of what has become little more than a marketing slogan make a difference as you evaluate the prospects of investing in new and old media/enterainment companies?

Back in the day -- when I was a young whipper snapper -- after walking to school uphill in the snow, we made a clear distinction, thanks, largely, to the limited choices at our disposal. There was network television, cable television (which only the loser kids did not have), and "premium" channels like HBO and Cinemax that you would sneak a glimpse of (read: Skinamax) when Mom and Dad were otherwise occupied. We never even considered the vinyl copy of Working Class Dog we were cranking or the late-night disc jockey who thought he was cool part of this limited media landscape.

Today, you consume content on your iPod, iPhone, and iPad, thus Apple (AAPL) is a media company. America's Company may not produce original content, but it plays the role of a modern day, hi-tech, mobile content distributor. Netflix (NFLX) streams other people's content and, soon, some of its own, putting it in a league similar to Apple. Cable companies, such as Time Warner (TWC) and Cablevision (CVC), offer programming from a slew of programmers, particularly networks ranging from Disney/ABC (DIS) to Scipps Interactive (SNI).

As the cable operators make a foray onto your iPad, they skirt the line between passive distributor of programming and new media incarnation. In radio, you have Sirius/XM, the prime purveyor of premium programming, but don't leave out terrestrial and Internet radio. Each provides something for nothing, but, increasingly companies like Clear Channel (CCMO.PK) and Pandora are moving into subscription-based premium areas. And don't forget about print entites with online presences. Papers like the Wall Street Journal, The New York Times (NYT), and Financial Times (see below) offer online registrants access to premium content and services. And, last but not least, you have new media conglomerates such as Demand and agitators like Huffington Post. I won't even bring up Facebook and other social media innovators.


*From the Financial Times' registration page

Who or what offers "premium" content, programs, or services? If they call it premium does that make it so? An article FT or the WSJ considers "premium" and charges an access fee for might not qualify as such in my world. Is it only premium because you have to pay for it? (No clever jokes, please) That doesn't pass muster either. Howard Stern's show did not become "premium content" overnight simply because he decided to jump from a distribution method that uses free as a business model to one that charges for a subscription. Are Cheers reruns only considered "premium" content when I watch them on Netflix or the Hallmark Channel, but not when I view them over-the-air after the late news? And who's to say that a satellite radio station dedicated to the music of Bruce Springsteen, Elvis Presley, or Pearl Jam is any more "premium" than the Genius mix Steve Jobs spins for me on iTunes? It's all subjective. "Premium" content's days are numbered.

If you have yet to figure it out, this is all quite torturous to follow. We live in a topsy-turvy media world these days. Who delivers content? Who creates it? I would go as far as to say we live in transformational and unprecendented times. Old contracts between cable companies and network programmers must be rewritten. They no longer apply. What Netflix accomplishes today it might not be able to accomplish tomorrow. With Steve Jobs' or Larry Page's signature on a check, Apple or Google (GOOG) could turn the world on its ears by taking out Scripps, Discovery Communications (DISCK), DirecTV (DTV), Dish Network (DISH), Netflix, or Sirius/XM.

As an investor you have several ways to play these interesting times.

Go with the leaders. You could buy the big names. The companies that lead, or at least appear to lead the media wars. If I had the means, I would commission a study to test a hypothesis of mine. I venture that the average American would, when asked, label companies like Apple and Netflix content creators. And I don't place this class of people into the same group as those who cannot name the two houses of Congress or claim to see Russia from their shores. It's logical. Who really knows where programming originates from? For the average consumer's purposes, the Apple's and Netflix's of the world are the end all and be all. It's about brand power. And it never hurts to invest in the companies that saturate the market with their platform.

Anticipate a buyout target. I am on this kick that a big player, such as Apple or Google or a major telecom player such as Verizon (VZ) or AT&T (T) is about to transform the media world as we know it. I think, however, that it's more than a kick or hunch. Heck, even Cramer's with me. The other shoe is about to drop, in one way, shape, or form. As investors, much of what we do involves speculation. Some times we win, sometimes we lose. It's anybody's guess who's going to buy who, but I think several more than plausible scenarios exist.

As I have stated in recent Seeking Alpha articles, I don't think Netflix can survive if it continues on its present course. Yet it needs to gobble up and offer content that people care about. If Apple is as serious as leading analysts think they are about entering the consumer's living room, a Netflix take-out makes perfect sense. Apple could also easily afford to effectively put Netflix out of commission -- or at least marginalize them severely -- by purchasing one of the above-mentioned media companies. Let your imagination run wild. In this day and age of hyper-change, almost everybody is in play, particularly when the predators are companies like Apple and Google.

Generally, you profit most in the short-term by buying the company that gets bought because they usually get bought out for quite a bit more than the value of their share price at the time of the acquisition. With a longer view, if you feel a company like Apple positions itself for even greater world domination with a large, strategic purchase, it's probably time to load up on the pullback. And, it goes without saying, it's tough to argue with using the type of balance sheet that helps put Apple in this position of power as support for your choice. This, of course, ties back into investing in a space's leaders.

Adhere to Peter Lynch. You could take the "easy" way out and buy what you know and like. For instance, place focus on the content as opposed to the company. Of course, you would have to believe that the content serves as the primary catalyst to drive growth in a media organization. For instance, if you think Sirius/XM's stable of impressive talents -- ranging from the Boss to Oprah Winfrey to Christy Canyon -- can continue to drive subscriber growth it might be a solid play. If think Rachael Ray and Tyra Banks represent the future -- and the companies that parter with them have keen foresight -- you'll want to see where they hang their hats. Both Ray and Banks signed deals with Demand Media recently to round out the digital portion of their for-public consumption portfolios. Personally, I am not a fan of the method of investing in Big Macs, but, clearly it has worked and continues to work for some very sharp people.

Just because the media and entertainment space we know today continues to evolve with volatility does not mean that sound short- and long-term trading and investing opportunities do not exist. You just have to decide the direction you think the business is going. Clearly, you'll be able to benefit if you make the right calls regarding several likelihoods -- some big players will continue to grow, others will emerge, M&A activity will increase, some old media players will turn new, and companies that have traditionally distributed content will either become more innovative in how they do so or start creating content of their own.

Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, but may initiate a short position in NFLX over the next 72 hours.


Powered By iWebRSS.com

precious metals investing in gold investing in silver bullion investing stocks

Unemployment falls in three-quarters of US cities (AP)

WASHINGTON ? Unemployment rates are falling in most metro areas across the country, suggesting that recent nationwide gains in hiring are widespread and not limited to a few healthy regions.

More than three-quarters of the nation's 372 largest metro areas reported lower unemployment rates in February than the previous month, the Labor Department said Wednesday. That's the most to report a decline since September.

And more than 300 areas added jobs in February compared to the previous month. That's a much better showing than January, when most metro areas lost jobs.

The gains "are definitely becoming a lot more broad-based," said Marisa DiNatale, a regional economist at Moody's Analytics.

The metro areas that posted the biggest job gains in February, compared with the previous month, were: Los Angeles-Long Beach, with a gain of 53,600; New York City-Northern New Jersey, a gain of 18,500; and Miami-Fort Lauderdale, up 16,800.

Many big cities also saw steep drops in unemployment from January to February. The rate dropped from 9.3 percent to 8.8 percent in Phoenix; from 7.3 percent to 6.9 percent in the Austin, Texas metro area; and from 11.5 percent to 10.6 percent in Jacksonville, Fla.

The metro employment data is distorted by seasonal trends, such as the layoff of temporary retail employees after the holidays. Since it is not seasonally adjusted, it is more volatile from one month to the next.

More than 300 cities have seen their unemployment rates decline in the past year, the best showing since the recession ended in June 2009.

And 284 metro areas reported job gains in the past year, also the most since the recession ended.

Nationwide, private employers added more than 200,000 jobs in both February and March, the best two-month pace since 2006. The local data is one month behind the national figures.

Many of the cities that posted job losses were state capitals. State governments around the country are laying off workers in an effort to reduce huge budget deficits. The Sacramento, Calif. metro area posted the largest job loss over the past year, shedding 13,600 jobs. The Albany, N.Y. region reported the fifth-biggest loss, with 4,900.

Sandusky, Ohio reported the biggest percentage increase in its payrolls over the past year, adding 3,100 new jobs, or a 9.6 percent gain. The city is a tourism hub and is benefiting from a renewed willingness among Americans to take vacations. Cedar Fair Entertainment Co., the nation's third-largest amusement park chain, is based in Sandusky, and so is one of its largest parks, Cedar Point. The chain reported record attendance in 2010.

A rebound in auto makers and other manufacturers has benefited many cities in the Midwest. That includes Kokomo, Ind., which reported the second-biggest percentage gain in jobs in the past year.

Lincoln, Neb. reported the nation's lowest unemployment rate, at 4.2 percent. Bismarck, N.D. posted the second-lowest, at 4.6 percent, followed by Ames, Iowa, Fargo, N.D. and Iowa City, Iowa, all at 4.7 percent.

El Centro, Calif. reported the highest unemployment rate, at 26.9 percent, followed by Yuma, Ariz., with 21.5 percent. The two cities are adjacent and include a large number of seasonal farm workers.


Powered By iWebRSS.com

precious metals investing in gold investing in silver bullion investing stocks

UK industrial production in surprise drop in Feb (AP)

LONDON ? British industrial production fell 1.2 percent in February from January, an official report said Wednesday, marking the largest monthly fall since August 2009 and far worse than analyst expectations for an increase of 0.2 percent.

The Office for National Statistics said a 7.8 percent drop in oil and gas extraction was the main reason for the fall, while the manufacturing sector was flat.

For the December-February period, overall industrial production was up 0.8 percent compared with the previous three months, while manufacturing output was up 1.1 percent.

"It may be that the industrial recovery is past its peak," said Samuel Tombs, U.K. economist at Capital Economics.

Industrial production accounts for 17 percent of British GDP.

"While not too much should be read into one month's data, especially following a strong gain the previous months, the stagnation in output in February will fuel concern that the manufacturing sector may be starting to come off the boil," said Howard Archer, chief European economist at IHS Global Insight.

The report coincided with the effective date of a mix of new tax measures which are expected to affect U.K. consumer spending.

Prime Minister David Cameron's government said 80 percent of taxpayers would be better off while the impact would be felt by the top 20 percent of earners.

The opposition Labour Party, however, produced figures claiming that a family with three children and an income of 52,000 pounds ($84,800) a year would be 1,700 pounds worse off from the combined effect of Wednesday's changes and the Jan. 1 rise in sales tax from 17.5 percent to 20 percent.

Meanwhile, the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders said registrations of new cars fell by 7.9 percent in March compared to a year ago, and total registrations in the first quarter was down by 8.7 percent.

Sales had been boosted last year by government-backed incentives to new car buyers who traded in a car more than 10 years old.

The Society expects new car registrations this year to finish 5 percent below 2010 levels.

Japanese carmaker Honda announced Wednesday that it plans to cut production at its U.K. factory by 50 percent from April 11. The company said the cutback follows interruptions in its supply chain caused by the earthquake and tsunami in Japan.

Unite, the union which represent workers at Honda, said the company agreed that pay would not be cut during the slowdown. The production cut will continue to the end of May, said Unite regional officer Jim D'Avila.


Powered By iWebRSS.com

stocks markets investing money finance

Raskin, Granholm eyed for agency: source (Reuters)

WASHINGTON (Reuters) ? The White House is considering Federal Reserve Governor Sarah Raskin and former Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm to head a new agency charged with protecting consumers of financial products, a source aware of the process said on Tuesday.

The consumer protection body will have broad powers to rein in abuses in the financial industry and was created in response to the aggressive and sometimes predatory lending practices that contributed to one of the worst financial crises in U.S. history in 2007-2009.

The Obama administration had considered the creation of the bureau one of the most important parts of the financial regulatory overhaul signed into law last summer.

However its creation has been tarnished by a months-old logjam over who should head the agency. Law professor Elizabeth Warren, an outspoken consumer advocate and harsh critic of industry practices who had championed the bureau's establishment, had been a leading candidate to run it but was seen as too confrontational to industry to overcome objections from Senate Republicans.

The agency head will need to win Senate confirmation, and even though Democrats hold a majority in the chamber, objection by even a single senator can create procedural hurdles hard to surmount.

SEEN AS READILY CONFIRMABLE

Raskin, who was recently named by President Barack Obama to a seat on the Fed's board, is viewed as readily able to win the needed confirmation to the office.

A former state banking regulator and former staffer on the Senate Banking Committee, Raskin is also seen by the White House as a candidate who would be acceptable to the financial services industry, the source added.

Granholm, who was the first female governor of Michigan, had been mentioned last year as a potential candidate for a seat on the Supreme Court.

She served for eight years as governor of a state that has been hit hard by the financial meltdown, the housing market collapse and the decline of the U.S. auto industry.

Granholm previously served as Michigan state attorney general and now advises the Pew Charitable Trusts on clean energy policies.

The source did not say whether other candidates besides Raskin and Granholm were under consideration.

Obama is under pressure from both ends of the political spectrum to name a head to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which is set to open in July. While tougher financial oversight was signed into law with great fanfare, it has encountered steady opposition from industry, who say it will raise costs for consumers and create obstacles to legitimate lending to individuals and businesses.

OPPOSITION TO REFORMS

Newly empowered Republican lawmakers who won a majority in the House of Representatives and added seats in the Senate in November have made slowing down or preventing the reforms a top legislative priority.

The agency would be tasked with preventing exploitation of consumers by financial service firms, such as through shoddy mortgage practices and excessive credit card fees. It also would play a role regulating the so-called shadow financial industry, including pay day lenders.

Warren, a Harvard professor who had pushed to establish the agency while heading a panel that investigated government bank bailouts during the crisis, had been seen as a likely candidate last year. However, she would face a difficult, if not insurmountable, uphill struggle on confirmation because many Republicans see her as too antagonistic toward industry.

Warren, who has been serving as an adviser to Obama and the U.S. Treasury, has been helping to set up the agency for its formal launch. She has made efforts to foster a good working relationship with the industry.

(With additional reporting by JoAnne Allen)

(Writing by Tim Ahmann; Editing by Carol Bishopric and Clarence Fernandez)


Powered By iWebRSS.com

precious metals investing in gold investing in silver bullion investing stocks

Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Summary Box: Stocks end mixed after Fed minutes (AP)

FED MINUTES: Minutes released from the most recent meeting of the Federal Reserve showed that the central bank does not plan on making any changes to its stimulus program. Members are split about whether it needs to tighten credit later this year to ward off inflation.

MATERIALS RISE: Materials companies gained 1.1 percent, the most of any S&P group, as traders anticipated that inflation would lead to higher prices.

THE INDEXES: The Dow Jones industrial average fell 6.13, or 0.1 percent, to 12,393.90. The S&P 500 was essentially unchanged at 1,332.63. The Nasdaq composite rose 2, or 0.1 percent, to 2,791.19.


Powered By iWebRSS.com

economics precious metals investing in gold investing in silver bullion investing

Germany won't funnel oil money from India to Iran

Published on Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 21:50 ��|� Updated at Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 22:16 � |� Source : PTI

'; } else if (google_ads.length > 1) { for(i=0; i '; else s +='
'; s +='

' + google_ads[i].line1 + '

' + google_ads[i].line2 + ' � ' + google_ads[i].line3 + '

' + google_ads[i].visible_url + '

'; } } s += ''; s += '

Powered By iWebRSS.com

investing in silver bullion investing stocks markets investing

Chemfab Alkalis declares dividend at Rs 2.50 per share

Apr 5 2011, 13:12

Expect good growth from India holdings, says Aberdeen AMC

- in MF-Interview


Powered By iWebRSS.com

stocks markets investing money finance

Massive Hack of Top E-Marketer May Leave Millions Open to Phishing Attacks

The databases of the world's largest email marketer were hacked last week, which means customers of major brands such as Citi, Marriott and Disney may soon find their in-boxes filling up with phishing scams.

Epsilon hosts databases of more than 2,500 clients, including seven of the Fortune 10, which they use to market to millions of customers. On April 1, Epsilon released the following brief statement:

The company gave no further details about the number of clients whose databases were hacked, or the number whose names and emails were stolen.

Epsilon did not immediately respond to Consumer Ally requests for comment. If and when they do reply, we'll update this story.

Epsilon, which describes itself as "the world's largest permission-based email marketing provider," sends more than 40 billion emails annually, so the number of stolen names and email addresses may well number in the millions.

Because the hackers managed to steal both names and email addresses of consumers, identity thieves may be able to use them to penetrate home computer defenses by sending targeted phishing emails from supposedly trusted sources.

Although Epsilon's not naming names, Security Week published the following list of Epsilon clients whose databases it says were among those hacked:

  • Kroger
  • TiVo
  • US Bank
  • JPMorgan Chase
  • Capital One
  • Citi
  • Home Shopping Network (HSN)
  • McKinsey & Company
  • Ritz-Carlton Rewards
  • Marriott Rewards
  • New York & Company
  • Brookstone
  • Walgreens
  • The College Board
  • Disney Destinations
  • Best Buy
If you're a customer of one of these companies, don't be surprised if you receive an email from them warning you to be on the lookout for phishing scams. Here's a copy of one such an email sent by Chase, which includes good advice for customers of any Epsilon client whose email was compromised:

Chase is letting our customers know that we have been informed by Epsilon, a vendor we use to send emails, that an unauthorized person outside Epsilon accessed files that included email addresses of some Chase customers. We have a team at Epsilon investigating and we are confident that the information that was retrieved included some Chase customer email addresses, but did not include any customer account or financial information. Based on everything we know, your accounts and confidential information remain secure. As always, we are advising our customers of everything we know as we know it, and will keep you informed on what impact, if any, this will have on you.

We apologize if this causes you any inconvenience. We want to remind you that Chase will never ask for your personal information or login credentials in an email. As always, be cautious if you receive e-mails asking for your personal information and be on the lookout for unwanted spam. It is not Chase's practice to request personal information by email.

As a reminder, we recommend that you:

  • Don't give your Chase OnlineSM User ID or password in email.
  • Don't respond to emails that require you to enter personal information directly into the email.
  • Don't respond to emails threatening to close your account if you do not take the immediate action of providing personal information.
  • Don't reply to emails asking you to send personal information.
  • Don't use your email address as a login ID or password.

The security of your information is a critical priority to us and we strive to handle it carefully at all times. Please visit our Security Center at chase.com and click on "Fraud Information" under the "How to Report Fraud." It provides additional information on exercising caution when reading emails that appear to be sent by us.

Sincerely,
Patricia O. Baker
Senior Vice President
Chase Executive Office

Hackers also broke into TripAdvisor's servers last month, making off with an unknown number of emails from the popular travel site, which boats 20 million members.

Powered By iWebRSS.com

investing money finance economics precious metals

Monday, April 4, 2011

How Cheap Is Intuit's Stock by the Numbers?

Numbers can lie -- yet they're the best first step in determining whether a stock is a buy. In this series, we use some carefully chosen metrics to size up a stock's true value based on the following clues:

  • The current price multiples.
  • The consistency of past earnings and cash flow.
  • The amount of growth we can expect.

Let's see what those numbers can tell us about how expensive or cheap Intuit (Nasdaq: INTU) might be.

The current price multiples
First, we'll look at most investors' favorite metric: the price-to-earnings ratio. It divides the company's share price by its earnings per share (EPS). The lower the P/E, the better.

Then we'll take things up a notch with a more advanced metric: enterprise value to unlevered free cash flow. This tool divides the company's enterprise value (basically, its market cap plus its debt, minus its cash) by its unlevered free cash flow (its free cash flow, adding back the interest payments on its debt). As with the P/E, the lower this number is, the better.

Analysts argue about which is more important -- earnings or cash flow. Who cares? A good buy ideally has low multiples on both.

Intuit has a P/E ratio of 25.4 and an EV/FCF ratio of 16.5 over the trailing 12 months. If we stretch and compare current valuations with the five-year averages for earnings and free cash flow, we see that Intuit has a P/E ratio of 31.2 and a five-year EV/FCF ratio of 21.5.

A one-year ratio of less than 10 for both metrics is ideal. For a five-year metric, less than 20 is ideal.

Intuit is 0-for-4 on hitting the ideal targets, but let's see how it stacks up against some of its competitors and industry mates.�

Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's; NM = not meaningful.

Numerically, we've seen how Intuit's valuation rates on both an absolute and relative basis. Next, let's examine ?

The consistency of past earnings and cash flow
An ideal company will be consistently strong in its earnings and cash-flow generation.

In the past five years, Intuit's net income margin has ranged from 13.8% to 17.3%. In that same time frame, unlevered free cash flow margin has ranged from 18.0% to 26.0%.

How do those figures compare with those of the company's peers? See for yourself:

anImage

Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's; margin ranges are combined.

In addition, over the past five years, Intuit has tallied up five years of positive earnings and five years of positive free cash flow.

Next, let's figure out ?

How much growth we can expect
Analysts tend to comically overstate their five-year growth estimates. If you accept them at face value, you will overpay for stocks. But even though you should definitely take the analysts' prognostications with a grain of salt, they can still provide a useful starting point when compared with similar numbers from a company's closest rivals.

Let's start by seeing what this company's done over the past five years. In that time period, Intuit has put up past EPS growth rates of 11.3%. Meanwhile, Wall Street's analysts expect future growth rates of 14.7%.

Here's how Intuit compares with its peers for trailing five-year growth:

anImage

Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's; EPS growth shown.

And here's how it measures up with regard to the growth analysts expect over the next five years:

anImage

Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's; estimates for EPS growth.

The bottom line
The pile of numbers we've plowed through has shown us the price multiples that shares of Intuit�are trading at, the volatility of its operational performance, and what kind of growth profile it has -- both on an absolute and a relative basis.

The more consistent a company's performance has been and the more growth we can expect, the more we should be willing to pay. We've gone well beyond looking at a 25.4 P/E ratio, and we see consistently strong profitability and solid growth to back up the high price multiples. If you find Intuit's numbers or story compelling, don't stop here. Continue your due-diligence process until you're confident that the initial numbers aren't lying to you.

Interested in reading more about any of these stocks? Add them to My Watchlist to find all of our Foolish analysis. And for more stock ideas, check out this recent article: "34 Expert Analysts Uncover Outstanding Dividend Plays."


Powered By iWebRSS.com

money finance economics precious metals investing in gold

Here Come the Increases in Coffee Prices

Price inflation is�about to hit from every angle. Since the financial crisis, Bernanke has printed too much money for it not to have a major impact. All indications are that it will hit hard in the second half of this year.

The only persons who appear not to be �concerned�about price inflation are�NYT columnist Paul Krugman and his former Princeton colleague,�Ben Bernanke, and other members of the Fed.

But keep in mind, just�a few�months ago Krugman wrote this:

There?s really nothing here to shake my view that deflation, not inflation, is the threat.
Bernanke, who famously said the subprime crisis is no big deal, has been�in lock step with�Krugman in his lack of concern about price inflation. This is really scary�since Bernanke is the captain of the money printing boat, known as the Federal Reserve.

And New York Fed president William Dudley doesn't think there is an inflation problem because as he put it: "Today you can buy an iPad 2 that costs the same as an iPad 1 that is twice as powerful. You have to look at the prices of all things."�A member of the audience quite correctly shouted to Dudley, ""You can't eat an iPad."

Anyway,�here's something more to contemplate while you drink your morning coffee.�SFC, again, this time on coffee�prices:

If it hasn't already, your local coffee shop is probably about to raise the cost of your morning latte.

Global coffee prices have doubled over the past year, recently reaching a 14-year high and leading national companies like Starbucks to increase prices in recent weeks. Peet's and some smaller Bay Area specialty coffee roasters raised prices in the fall, while others are just now announcing increases. And it doesn't look as if it will stop there...
Coffee prices generally fluctuate with the C market, a global commodity futures market that establishes benchmark prices for green arabica beans, the highest-grade coffee. Last spring.

(Thanks2Nick)

Powered By iWebRSS.com

precious metals investing in gold investing in silver bullion investing stocks

Stocks opening higher amid fresh round of deals (AP)

NEW YORK ? Stocks are rising in early trading following a new round of corporate deals.

Pfizer, the world's largest drugmaker, said Monday that it would it sell its Capsugel unit to an affiliate of private equity firm Kohlberg Kravis Roberts for $2.38 billion in cash. Capsugel makes capsules for oral medicines and dietary supplements.

Overseas, Vivendi says it has agreed to acquire Vodafone Group's 44 percent stake in French mobile operator SFR for $11.3 billion. Belgian plastics and chemicals company Solvay is also offering to buy Paris-based chemicals maker Rhodia for $4.84 billion.

The Dow Jones industrial average is up 8, or 0.1 percent, at 12,385. The Standard & Poor's 500 index is up 2, or 0.2 percent, at 1,335. The Nasdaq composite index is up 10, or 0.4 percent, at 2,348.


Powered By iWebRSS.com

stocks markets investing money finance

Instant View: BOJ tankan shows quake to hit business mood (Reuters)

TOKYO (Reuters) ? Big Japanese manufacturers expect conditions to worsen significantly in the next three months, responses to a Bank of Japan survey collected after the March 11 earthquake showed on Monday. It was a reversal of the full survey results.

The BOJ separated figures in its tankan survey of corporate sentiment for March into responses obtained before and after the earthquake to obtain a clearer picture of how firms perceived the effects of the devastation.

For a graphic: http://graphics.thomsonreuters.com/11/03/JP_BOJTKN0311_CT.gif

*************************************************************

KEY POINTS:

-- The post-quake index for big manufacturers' sentiment was plus 6 , the same as the full survey's plus 6 reading and plus 5 in December, the data showed.

-- The big manufacturers' index for June 2011 was seen at minus 2, showing that firms expect conditions to worsen. The reading for the full survey was plus 2.

COMMENTARY:

JUNKO NISHIOKA, CHIEF ECONOMIST, RBS SECURITIES, TOKYO

"The survey results were better than expected despite the fact the BOJ collected replies up until the end of March. This may be due to drops in the number of responses from companies in quake-hit areas.

"Still, the degree of deterioration that companies anticipate in the coming three months was substantial and this could prompt the BOJ to tone up its resolve to supply ample liquidity to markets at this week's policy meeting."

NAOMI FINK, JAPAN STRATEGIST, JEFFERIES & CO., HONG KONG

"The outlook has really deteriorated. That is what you would have expected. It went from favorable to not favorable. But this is not a complete picture pre- and post-quake. Manufacturers and non-manufacturers were acknowledging things good before the quake, but they plunged into uncertainty one quarter ahead."

YASUO YAMAMOTO, SENIOR ECONOMIST, MIZUHO RESEARCH INSTITUTE

"Many companies have still been unable to fully grasp the fallout from the earthquake and subsequent nuclear crisis. But they may be thinking the damage will not turn out to be as big as that seen in the wake of the collapse of the Lehman Brothers.

"The last financial crisis caused a plunge in global demand, but this time companies are facing restriction in output. This may make them feel less worried about potential impacts on their earnings once production gets back on line.

"The yen's rise proved short-lived after the earthquake thanks to joint G7 intervention, which has also supported corporate sentiment.

"The BOJ is likely to stand pat on monetary policy at its rate review this week as it needs more time to determine future developments. But it will cut its view on the economic outlook, citing a heightening of downside risks, and signal its readiness to ease further depending on the yen, long-term rates and the real economy."

KOICHI OGAWA, CHIEF PORTFOLIO MANAGER, DAIWA SB INVESTMENTS

"The positive figure for March strikes me as a bit odd and it's a bit difficult to believe. I wonder if the impact of the disaster is really reflected in the result, given that you've still got the rolling power blackouts and Fukushima, among other things.

"The minus figure for June is not a surprise given that it factors in various impacts from the quake. We could see positive figures for September and the year-end when you factor in the boost from relief spending and a recovery in production, but I don't expect the situation to have normalized come June."

YOSHIKIYO SHIMAMINE, CHIEF ECONOMIST AT DAI-ICHI LIFE RESEARCH INSTITUTE

"The fall in the outlook is not as big as I feared, but I cannot be optimistic either because it remains unclear how the situation with the nuclear accident and the electric power supply will develop over the next three months.

"The Japanese economy showed a recovery trend in the January-March period before the earthquake. Whether it could get back on that trend depends on stabilizing the nuclear plant and the power supply."

MASAMICHI ADACHI, SENIOR ECONOMIST, JPMORGAN SECURITIES JAPAN

"It's a big surprise -- that number is too good. After the quake the number is still 6 for the headline number, and if you look at the non-manufacturing sector after the quake is better than before the quake, which is impossible.

"I think there must be some technical issue with formulating the number from receiving the surveys. I think many firms will have filled out the surveys before the quake and sent them after the quake, so this reading may be misleading to gauge the impact of the quake.

"Of course, after the quake the outlook is definitely looking worse but the impact is only an 8 point decline. That is not a huge decline that maybe we could expect in coming months. Many firms may not have realized the impact immediately after the quake.

"I think the BoJ also realises this may be a little misleading to gauge the impact. They will still be cautious on the outlook and our view is the BoJ needs to ease further in this week's policy meeting. However, the market consensus is for staying on hold."

BACKGROUND:

-- The sentiment indexes are derived by subtracting the percentage of respondents who say conditions are poor from those who say they are good. A negative reading means pessimists outnumber optimists.

-- The Bank of Japan will hold its two-day policy meeting this week and the central bank has expressed its readiness to loosen monetary policy further as early as this month if there is evidence that the quake's damage could threat Japan's return to a moderate economic recovery.

-- The government, which estimates material damage from the quake at about 16 trillion yen to 25 trillion yen ($190-300 billion), aims to compile several emergency budgets to cope with the disaster, with the first likely due by the end of this month, while it juggles how to fund disaster relief. ($1 = 84.060 Japanese Yen)

(Reporting by Taiga Uranaka, Rie Ishiguro and Tetsushi Kajimoto in TOKYO, Richard Leong in HONG KONG, and Mantik Kusjanto in Wellington; Editing by Edmund Klamann and Nathan Layne)


Powered By iWebRSS.com

precious metals investing in gold investing in silver bullion investing stocks

Sunday, April 3, 2011

Why Wearing a Baseball Cap Backwards is Retarded

Why Wearing a Baseball Cap Backwards is Retarded

Thanks to Ron H.

Powered By iWebRSS.com

bullion investing stocks markets investing money

U.S. Consumers Have Big Banks to Blame for High Gas Prices

There is a bit of irony in that the very same banks that taxpayers bailed out, and saved from going completely belly up, are now making you pay once again in the form of higher Oil prices, and the resultant higher gasoline prices at the pump (Fig. 1). Don`t be fooled by the rhetoric generated in the media by the Big Banks regarding the Middle East.


It All Started With Jackson Hole?.

This run-up in oil prices started with Fed Chairman Bernanke`s Jackson Hole speech, where the big banks realized they were going to get a bunch more juice in the form of POMO operations by the Federal Reserve to play around in markets with.

And what did the large financial institutions do with this newly created juice? Instead of allocating the almost zero percent money they are all borrowing to productive activities such as lending loans to small businesses-- which will create jobs and stimulate the economy, the big banks have decided that since the fed is electronically printing money and providing extra liquidity / juice for financial markets, this is inflationary and devalues the dollar.


All Fed Juice Leads to Commodities

And just to make things worse, the big banks have decided to take their cheap capital they borrow at basically zero percent , and invest into commodities, i.e., agricultural futures like Wheat, Corn, and Soybeans, energy futures like Oil and Gasoline (Fig. 2), and industrial and precious metals like Copper, Gold and Silver.

The unique aspect is that loose monetary policy isn`t problematic at face value when you are trying to stimulate growth, it is what the Big Banks are utilizing this cheap capital for that becomes problematic from an inflation standpoint. The very problem that the Banks are worried about in regards to inflation, they are in fact responsible for creating through self-fulfilling investment practices with regard to this cheap capital at their disposal.


Long Commodities, Short Dollar - Adding Inflation

But it gets worse... because at the same time they also short the U.S. Dollar, and go long the commodity currencies like the Canadian and Australian Dollar, which further exacerbates the slide in the U.S. Dollar (Fig. 3), reinforcing the entire trade that they need to buy more commodities as an inflation hedge, further juicing up commodities like oil and gasoline.


Inflation Up, Purchasing Power Down

The consumer is hurt in two ways. The first is that higher prices eat into their monthly budget with a higher percentage of their disposable income needed for purchasing items like milk, eggs, bread, and gasoline. Secondly, because the Dollar is losing its store of value, the consumer is losing its purchasing power, i.e., what a dollar is worth in relative terms around the world, and what it can buy. In other words, it is like getting a pay cut at work from your company, the amount hasn`t changed, but what goods that amount will be able to buy is less.


Consumers Getting Double Stiffed

The Big Banks like JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Goldman Sachs (GS), Morgan Stanley (MS), HSBC (HBC.A), UBS, and BOA-Merrill Lynch (BAC)are some of the largest energy traders in the world. They all derive considerable trading revenue from the markets each quarter. So when you hear that Goldman Sachs, or BOA didn`t have a single losing trading day for a given quarter, these banks are taking a lot of money out of the market, and much of their hefty trading profits are generated from commodities like food and energy.

And guess who is footing the bill for these trading profits? Yes, the U.S. consumer-- the very same U.S. consumer who bailed them out during the financial crisis. Talk about getting short shrifted twice. (I cleaned up the last sentence, but you get the gist.)


2008 Oil Bubble Redux

Currently, there are no supply shortages in the oil market, but what you have is a bunch of speculators going wild pushing up energy prices hyping the Middle East, Peak Oil, The Nigeria Card (remember in 2008 where every little Nigerian pipeline was under attack every day during that run-up, and all the sudden Nigerian pipeline attacks were inconsequential for two years?that`s the Nigerian Card-bring it out when traders are in Trend Trading Nirvana.)

What we have here is a 2008 redux. The Brent contract on the ICE exchange is being used to engineer prices up, as it is an unregulated exchange with no real transparency on position limits by the Big Banks. The Big Banks are also piling a bunch of money into commodity related ETFs and mutual funds, which in turn have to buy exposure to the futures market in all these commodities. Add in the hedge funds, pension funds, money managers, and retail traders, and voila! You have these bubbles created which have no relation to the underlying fundamentals.


Trend Trading Hyper Leverage

It all comes down to fund flows, capital going into the commodity trade because it is going up, further adding fuel to fire that this is the place to be. Welcome to the self-reinforcing cycle of Trend Trading.

However, it gets even worse, because we have one-sided markets with no substantial pullbacks which normal healthy markets have. The Big Banks are able to add to their original positions with the profits they have locked in with stops that are already hugely profitable. The Big Banks are then buying additional futures contracts, pushing these same commodities up further, until eventually the bubble bursts like 2008, when everyone runs for the exits at the same time.

The effect is that by adding to original positions via locked in profits, the Big Banks have added even more liquidity / juice to the market ? a form of hyper leverage without real risk. This results in the consumer paying more at the pump, not because there is less supply of oil in the market, but largely because of a trading technique that artificially inflates prices by adding more juice to the equation.


Crude Oil ? An 'Engineered' Market

I know we had a recession, but Crude Oil went from $143 dollars a barrel to $33 in six months. Now, you don`t think demand dropped off that much, do you? It didn`t, even when a consumer lost his / her job , which at most we went from a 5% unemployment level to slightly above 10% -- did this 5% completely stop consuming fuel? I know this is an oversimplification; however you can follow where I am going with this line of reasoning -- Crude Oil should never have been $143 a barrel in the first place!

It was stage-managed to those levels the last time by the Big Banks like Goldman Sachs. Remember the infamous ?$200 Oil Call? by the Goldman analyst ? do you truly believe that happened by accident? It most likely served a purpose for Goldman Sachs at the time, to help ?market? the price of Crude Oil.


Banks Long Oil...Gee, You Think?

You now have Nomura Securities with their $220 Oil Call, and J.P. Morgan pumping out weekly analysts forecasts regarding Crude Oil targets of $130 for the second quarter. Why make these price forecasts available to the media and the public if they aren`t used for a purpose? Wouldn`t they want to keep these reserved for their paying, private clients? Gee, I wonder if they are positioned long in the Oil Market?

You guessed it. The same Banks that won`t give you a loan-- or a credit card because your credit score isn`t perfect-- is making your financial condition even worse by pushing up the price of Oil, Food and Gasoline when there are no real supply shortages in the market.

The overall trend of a decline in new consumer credit line approval has also been noted by the industry monitoring service at credit-land , whereas in early 2008 a FICO score of 625 was still acceptable for approval, today you would need a score of 725 or more to qualify for the same offers.

So, what is taking place in the market are traders hitting revenue goals by trading commodities, using the QE2 liquidity, in order to maximize their bonuses.


Fed, The Enabler

This is not all the Big Banks fault, as just like in 2005-2007, regulations were eased to let them all lever up over 40 times base capital. Well, Chairman Bernanke and the Fed`s extremely loose monetary policies have enabled the banks to profit enormously from trading behavior and investment choices which inevitably have led to the creation of another inflationary bubble. We still have a long way to go in recovering from the last Fed fueled bubble regarding the Housing Industry from the Alan Greenspan era of overly loose monetary policy.

Higher Margin Requirements - Not The Solution

In addition, the CFTC was supposed to come up with position limits for the Big Banks over 3 months ago, but even the limits they were considering were not going to do any good. The CME has raised margin requirements on all the commodities, but this actually makes things worse because it squeezes out more of the smaller speculators. It concentrates more of the contract from a percentage standpoint with the Big Banks who have access to all the capital they could ever need at zero percent interest.

If you raise margins for the Big Banks, they just go borrow more money to cover the raised requirements, but they never have to reduce positions like the smaller players. This makes for less of a diverse market. Therefore, raising margins isn`t the answer either. In other words, don`t expect any relief from the CFTC or the exchanges--they really are powerless to reduce this type of speculative fervor.


Two Ways To Tame Big Bank Cats

There really are only two options:

1) Bernanke has to immediately change his tone, and become much more hawkish regarding inflation, and he needs to do this immediately-- as in, Monday morning. He needs to say something to the effect: ?Due to rapidly building food and energy cost pressures, the Fed needs to seriously discuss the idea of cutting short QE2 at our next monetary policy meeting on the 27th of April?.

That`s literally all Bernanke would have to say, not that they are going to cut QE2 short, just discuss the idea, and that you are worried about rising inflationary pressures in the economy exemplified by the unprecedented spike in gasoline prices. This would send the right message to the speculators, and curb much of the speculative fervor. All commodities would instantly sell off. For example, Oil would drop by $3.50 in an hour, and the RBOB contract would drop 18 cents.

This is how you can even maintain all the benefits of a relatively loose monetary policy without all of the acute negative consequences of unchecked speculation, which we are experiencing right now in commodities. It?s a one sided trade, that is crowded, unnatural, and bad for markets and consumers alike.

2) The second option is more micro managing an individual commodity. Let`s take Oil for example. President Obama could make a statement on Monday morning stating the following: ?I have decided to open up the Strategic Petroleum Reserves to the market, not because there are any supply shortages in Crude Oil, far from it, actually, but we want to target the excessive speculation that we believe is occurring right now in the Oil market?.

Again that`s all it would take, and Crude Oil would be down $3.50 and gasoline would drop as well. You do not even need to sell any Oil from the reserves, it actually isn`t needed. The important part is the message that you are sending to markets, ?this is not a riskless, one way trade.?


Speculation Not All Bad, But...

Speculation isn`t always bad, in fact, it often serves many valid purposes within markets. But excessive speculation to the point where markets diverge considerably from the underlying fundamentals is never a good thing. And it is important for those in positions of authority to manage such markets appropriately through legislative regulation, monetary policy, or simply managing market participants? expectations by sending the right types of messages to markets.


Fed's Punchbowl Ends Here & Now

However, our policy makers so far have mismanaged the message being sent to Wall Street. It is something along the lines of ?Get drunk at the Fed inspired liquidity punchbowl, and don`t worry about the mess you make?. The message the Federal Reserve should be sending is, ?Make sure you don`t drink too much at the liquidity punchbowl, or we will take it away?.

The reasoning here is that it is always much easier to prevent the mess in the first place, than to try and clean it up afterwards. We have reached the point where the Fed needs to take the punchbowl away!


Powered By iWebRSS.com

investing in gold investing in silver bullion investing stocks markets

"BRICS" to talk economic coordination, not yuan: China (Reuters)

BEIJING (Reuters) ? Leaders from five of the world's top emerging economies will discuss a coordinated stance on economic issues such as commodity price fluctuations, but the yuan's exchange rate is off the agenda, a senior Chinese diplomat said on Saturday.

The mid-April "BRICS" summit will gather leaders from China, Russia, India, Brazil and South Africa in the southern Chinese beach resort of Sanya.

The summit is unlikely to achieve much concrete, though it will give the world's big rising economies a venue to coordinate views on global financial reforms, commodity prices and other shared concerns.

"The BRICS countries have similar concerns or stances on important questions like the global economy, international finance and development," Assistant Chinese Foreign Minister Wu Hailong told a news conference.

"We hope all sides can strengthen coordination and mutual cooperation on reform of the international currency system, commodity price fluctuations, climate change and sustainable development," he added.

China hoped the summit would in particular be able to coalesce views on commodity price fluctuations ahead of the G20 summit in Cannes, France, later this year, Wu said.

"This is a topic at the G20 summit in Cannes and ... the leaders of the five countries will exchange views on this," he added. "We hope that the five countries' leaders can have a joint stance on this issue and reach a broad consensus."

But Wu said the Chinese currency's exchange rate would not be talked about at the Sanya summit. Some countries say China keeps the yuan artificially undervalued to help boost Chinese exports.

"The renminbi's exchange rate is not on the agenda for discussion," he said, repeating China's standard line that its currency was not the cause of global imbalances.

China's hard work at perfecting the yuan's exchange rate mechanism was "clear for all to see," he added. Renmibi is the yuan's formal name.

Brazilian government officials have said they want to discuss the issue of the yuan, whose cheap value they say has helped fuel a flood of Chinese imports and deteriorated Brazil's trade balance.

The BRICS group has emerged as a loose united front to press the rich Western economies, especially the United States, which has traditionally dominated global diplomacy.

Yet there are many disparities among the BRICS member countries, and the past two summits of the evolving group have not achieved much. This time, too, strains over China's currency policies and trade surpluses could make real agreement even harder to reach.

The leaders may also discuss Libya and the broader situation in the Middle East.

"It would be natural if the leaders discussed this issue, but at the moment we have not heard that any country has said they wish to make a dedicated statement on it," Wu said.

China, with Russia, India, Brazil and other developing countries have condemned the U.S.-led air strikes on Libyan forces. South Africa, on the other hand, voted in favor of the United Nations Security Council resolution authorizing the air strikes.

(Editing by Jeremy Laurence)


Powered By iWebRSS.com

bullion investing stocks markets investing money

Music Industry Sings a Sad Song on Sales Despite a Sharp Drop-off in Piracy

Recorded music sales in America plunged another 7% to about $6.2 billion last year as the sharp 16% drop in CD revenue more than offset gains in digital-media sales, according to a report released this week by consultant Strategy Analytics. Overall sales fell despite the fact that far fewer people are illegally downloading music tracks through peer-to-peer services than did a few years ago, according to a separate report.

Digital music sales will overtake CD sales for the first time next year as more people switch over to iTunes and MP3 files. CD spending in the U.S. will fall $1 billion this year to $2.7 billion, while online music sales will hit $2.8 billion. By 2015, single-track downloads will represent about 40% of online-music revenues, followed by album downloads (32%) and advertising and subscription services (14% each).

"Digital music is not developing as fast as expected," says Martin Olausson, director of digital media research at Strategy Analytics, in a statement. "While online revenues will expand further over the coming years, the overall size of the recorded music industry will continue to contract as record companies struggle to identify growth strategies."

Such trends reflect a trend that started shortly after Apple (AAPL) introduced its first-generation iPod in 2001. By 2008, Apple passed Walmart (WMT) to become the largest music retailer in the U.S.

Illegal Downloads Decline
After LimeWire Shutdown

The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), which hasn't released 2010 numbers, said 2009 retail sales from physical media like compact discs and albums dropped 20% from a year earlier to $4.38 billion and more than offset a 19% jump in sales from digital sales. Overall, U.S. music sales fell 12% in 2009 to about $7.69 billion, according to the RIAA.

Illegal music downloads have fallen off markedly since peer-to-peer (P2P) file-sharing giant LimeWire shut down in October 2010. The number of P2P users downloading music late last year fell almost 45% from three years earlier to about 16 million people, NPD Group said in a report released last week. Additionally, the typical P2P music user downloaded an average of 18 tracks during the fourth quarter of 2010, just half of the average from the fourth quarter of 2007, NPD Group said.

"In the past, we've noted that hard-core peer-to-peer users would quickly move to other Web sites that offered illegal music file sharing," said Russ Crupnick, entertainment industry analyst for NPD, in a statement. "It will be interesting to see if services like Frostwire and Bittorrent take up the slack left by Limewire, or if peer-to-peer music downloaders instead move on to other modes of acquiring or listening to music."

Regardless, such a trend towards digital and away from physical are being reflected globally as well. Worldwide music fans purchased $17.4 billion worth of music last year, marking an 8.4% drop from a year earlier and a 44% plunge from a peak number of $27.3 billion in both 1998 and 1999, as a plunge in compact-disc sales more than offset gains in digital revenue. PaidContent reported this week, citing a report from the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI). Sales of physical media i.e. CDs, fell 14% last year and are just half their 2005 levels, according to the report.


Powered By iWebRSS.com

money finance economics precious metals investing in gold

Saturday, April 2, 2011

Obama says spending deal close, Boehner doesn't (AP)

WASHINGTON ? A bullish President Barack Obama said Friday that compromise is close with Republicans on $33 billion in budget cuts, and he warned that without a deal the ensuing government shutdown would "jeopardize our economic recovery" just as jobs are finally being created.

Despite his assessment, negotiators reported little progress, Senate Democrats backtracked on a key concession from earlier in the week and Congress' top Republican sounded less optimistic than the president that a breakthrough was imminent.

"There is no number. There is no agreement on a number" on how much to cut, insisted House Speaker John Boehner, who is under pressure from tea party-backed conservatives not to give too much ground. Still, he added, "I am not preparing for a government shutdown."

Funding for the government expires next Friday at midnight, and without action by Congress, a partial shutdown would follow.

The day's events occurred against a backdrop of unusually upbeat news about the economy, which is still recovering from the worst recession since the Great Depression. The Labor Department reported that companies added 216,000 jobs last month and the unemployment rate fell slightly to 8.8 percent.

Nearly six weeks after the House passed a bill calling for $61 billion in cuts, it appeared the endgame was at hand in the first of what is expected to be a series of political battles over the size and scope of government.

"We will be working through the weekend to forge a compromise," said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. At Republican insistence, Congress has already cut $10 billion in spending as part of a pair of stopgap spending bills to keep the government open for business.

While another short-term bill has not been ruled out, Obama, Boehner, Reid and others have said they would prefer to complete work on a six-month bill to close out the budget year.

Already, Republicans are looking ahead to unveiling a 2012 budget next week, after weighing privately whether to delay so they could focus all of their attention on the current clash.

Administration officials have been heavily involved in the negotiations on the spending bill, but the president struck something of an above-the-fray note on Friday.

"Given the encouraging news we received today on jobs, it would be the height of irresponsibility to halt our economic momentum because of the same old Washington politics," he said.

"It can't be `my way or the highway politics,' said the president, who has sought in recent months to recapture the support of independents who helped elect him in 20008 but defected to the Republicans in last fall's elections.

"We know that a compromise is within reach. And we also know that if these budget negotiations break down, it could shut down the government and jeopardize our economic recovery."

Shortly before Obama spoke, Reid shifted the Democrats' position on one key element of the talks, in apparent deference to environmentalists angered by an earlier concession.

"Neither the White House or the Senate leaders is going to accept any EPA riders," he said in a conference call with reporters.

House Republicans included provisions in their $61 billion package of spending cuts that would block the EPA from implementing regulations on a variety of industries.

Democratic officials indicated earlier in the week some of them would be incorporated into any agreement as part of a deal under which Republicans would agree to accept total cuts less than $61 billion.

In response to Reid's statement, Kevin Smith, a spokesman for Boehner, said, "If they are taking EPA riders off the table, then we're certainly not `close' to a deal."

In fact, it appeared the two sides had agreed to little, except that they would assemble a framework to cut $33 billion from current spending levels.

The original House measure would cut $61 billion from domestic accounts, including administration priorities such as education and infrastructure.

Senate Democrats and the White House have proposed adding defense cuts to the bill in an attempt to reduce the burden on domestic programs. Boehner declined at his news conference to say whether that was acceptable to him.

The speaker has assumed an increasingly public role in the past week, making numerous appearances before television cameras to stress that Republicans want to cut spending but do not favor a government shutdown.

In doing so, he has spent part of his time countering Democratic accusations, but he also has sought to maintain his ability to compromise in the light of tea party demands.

At a news conference during the day, Rep. Paul Broun, R-Ga., said any bill with less than $61 billion was an insult, and he vowed to vote against it.

But a half dozen or more other Republicans, most of them first-termers, declined to follow his lead, making it clear that they are prepared to accept some sort of compromise.

Another first-term Republican, Rep. Tim Scott, R-S.C., said "The further you get from $61 billion, the less likely" he and the other 86 freshmen Republicans are to support a deal.

But he, like others, declined to say what sort of compromise he was ready to vote for.


Powered By iWebRSS.com

investing in silver bullion investing stocks markets investing